Navrátil Travel · European competitive field

Thirty-eight operators, ranked by what they actually sell

The competitor list was supplied. The analysis was rebuilt from the ground up: corporate filings, live catalogues, real prices per day, destination-by-destination overlap, measured site performance and audience read off the live profiles. Graded on evidence rather than by eye, the ranking inverts.

Observed 28 August 2026 · 38 companies · 90 fields

What the ranking says

Threat is scored out of 100 from four measurable inputs: how many of Navrátil's hard-access destinations the operator actually sells (45), how close its price per day sits to Navrátil's €320 (20), market adjacency (20), and audience scale (15).

The relevance grading in the supplied workbook is inverted at the top. Lupine Travel, filed there as low relevance, sells bookable departures to 11 of the 13 hard-access destinations Navrátil sells, and undercuts on price on both flagship products.

Nine companies graded low relevance measure Medium or High. All five of the genuine hard-access specialists sit in that group. The three graded high relevance overlap on one destination between them.

One real competitor was missing from the list entirely. CK Alvarez of Hradec Králové sells the same Afghanistan itinerary with flights to Kabul included. The list does contain Travel Alvaro, an unrelated Slovak operator with a similar name that sells no hard-access product at all.

Ranked by measured threat

Top 18 of 37. Bar colour is the measured band; the label to the right is the grade in the supplied workbook.

High Medium Low Not on the supplied list

Every company, scored